Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Parallèle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Sirius XM Radio channels. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Radio Parallèle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. A search for sources returns no independent reliable sources. It seems we have several articles on non-notable satellite radio channels. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 00:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 00:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge just a sentence or two to as WP:ATD. &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the list. Per WP:NMEDIA, satellite radio channels can be notable if they pass WP:GNG on the sourcing, but are not "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have sources. But the only footnotes here are a press release self-published by XM, which isn't support for notability at all, and a single deadlinked news article that glanced off this channel's existence in the process of being about XM dumping a bunch of channels all at once, which is fine but not in and of itself enough. Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.