Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Reverb (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per SK1 - Technically my rationale is now incorrect as someone did find something so thus the delete !vote is pretty much moot, Not sure why I never found any but thanks for finding some. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 11:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Radio Reverb
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well there's no time like the present!, Previous AFD was closed as No Consensus about 5minutes ago but nothing's changed since the last nomination so renomming for a second time.

Non notable radio station, Can't find anything at all on the station, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Davey. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - has OFCOM license, has been featured in media here and here and here in this autobiography, this published academic paper, was mentioned in this debate in the UK parliament etc. JMWt (talk) 11:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.