Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio SHARK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  Sango  123    (e)  19:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Radio SHARK
This fails Wikipedia's policy on the notability of products. A quick Google search shows mostly reviews and simple product listings. And the Radio SHARK certainly has not become a genericized trademark. joturn e r 05:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Do published independent reviews in a major magazine (e.g. MacWorld) not count? The notability guidelines seem to indicate that they do ("This criterion includes published works in all forms..."). The Griffin radioSHARK is a well-known, widely-used and easily-recognised product. --Canley 06:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The policy on the notability of products you cite don't seem to exclude reviews. So on the basis of the nomination, I vote Keep. Vizjim 11:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per above, but I think the article is just a bit advertisement-y. -- Kicking222 15:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Kicking222 M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 02:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well written article about a notable product. TheMadBaron 16:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote. The article title does however, sound similar to Radio Shack. --Nintendude userpage 09:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.