Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Tatras International (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Radio Tatras International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 09:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 09:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Non-notable podcaster that has been tagged for lack of WP:RS for four years now. Promises have long been made that the WP:RS are going to appear, but they haven't appeared, and I can't find any. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Qworty (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tried looking for non-primary sources which give substantial coverage to the station and came up empty. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.   GregJackP   Boomer!   13:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The previous deletion debate noted that actually having been a licenced radio station was sufficient for notability - is this criterion in policy? - David Gerard (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find any policy specifically addressing this point. However, I did turn up the essay Notability (media) which argues that having a licence isn't sufficient to be notable; it gives many examples of licensed stations which are non-notable.  The general notability criterion for radio stations it gives is "either a large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming." —Psychonaut (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Broadcasting says it all PN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.42.254 (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * In that case, delete barring a sudden flood of RS coverage - David Gerard (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Nothing in sk.wikipedia, fwiw (though that's a 180,000 article Wikipedia) - David Gerard (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, but incidentally - is this the same RTI of 'RTI Investigates Wikipedia' RTI user nonsense  ferret  15:37, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. The owner of RTI is also the CEO of Train2Game, the subject of the article which it's "investigating". —Psychonaut (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * well nonsenseferret you just had to go and open your big mouth didn't you, best regards :) nonsense  ferret  19:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Psychonaut, I have asked in another place for your evidence re the CEO of Train2Game, why do you continue to make such claims without following WP procedures and supporting your claim. the easy way would be to get a ref from the UK's Companies House. regards RTI — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.42.254 (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * - as you well know I had already noted on Talk:Train2Game - David Gerard (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The company check does not reference this SRO and further there is no evidence of who is the CEO of Train2Game being put forward. I am beginning to wonder if all of this is purely for other means and in fact has nothing to do with anything reliable. No offense meant to sensible people. WP states you should reference things, where are your references for the "SRO" and the "CEO" of Train2Game? I know why they fail to appear - you have none. Have a good evening and let's not forget there is a real world outside with hard facts that only need conversation to verify them. Regards RTI — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.42.254 (talk) 18:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Still not signing your posts I see. Your refusal to comply with Wikipedia's standards in such a small way does not bode well.
 * Re: "without following WP procedures", please provide the exact time and page where this happened and exactly which "WP procedure" (actually, we have guidelines and policies, like the one about signing your posts) you believe was violated. If you are not able to provide those two things, please stop making unfounded accusations. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Somehow, I got here via Train2Game. Anyway, the page fails to provide any notability, and no WP:RS can be found.  Zappa  O  Mati   04:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.