Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radioactive cloud

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT. I've redirected it to Nuclear fallout. Couldn't find anything to merge. Mgm|(talk) 20:55, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Radioactive cloud
Believe it or not, a radioactive cloud is a cloud of radioactivity. I cannot see any way in which this can expand to become an encyclopaedia article. Uncle G 19:10, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Redirect to Nuclear fallout. There's nothing to merge, but the term "Radioactive cloud" is established enough to warrant a redirect. --Plek 20:23, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/redirect I believe it could be expanded. Grue 20:29, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect Would be a very useful redirect.  Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 22:36, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge any non-duplicated information with the fallout article. I agree with Smoddy. There might be some potential to discuss fictional radioactive clouds, but that can probably be handled under fallout, too. 23skidoo 23:43, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, needs definite expansion, if not merge with Nuclear fallout and add redirect. Megan1967 02:45, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, to fallout --Enigma 02:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nuclear fallout as specified above. That article contains enough information such that Radioactive cloud isn't needed. --Deathphoenix 18:52, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge. Samaritan 21:17, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)