Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiohead's eighth studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The result was Redirect to Radiohead per WP:CRYSTAL via WP:HAMMER and WP:SNOW. Once sufficient verifiable information is available from reliable sources, this action can be easily reversed. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 20:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Radiohead's eighth studio album
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Album has received no significant coverage; article is speculative and until recently, based largely on WP:OR. Will this album ever actually come to fruition? Ask the crystal ball.

Unlike In Rainbows, this album does not yet have enough independent coverage to warrant an article. Bdb484 (talk) 00:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER, which is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:TenPoundHammer's Law. Edison (talk) 01:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Quietus source is pretty short and the only information given about the album is pretty much "It's going great, but apart from that I have nothing else to report." The BBC source doesn't offer much more information. It's probably too early for this album to have an article yet. Jafeluv (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article offers no more info than what is already on the Radiohead page. I say leave it alone until at least the title of the album is confirmed. --Pritoolmachine2806 (talk) 06:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -  "I'm a creep, with a Wp:HAMMER". (Seriously, no release date or name means there's realistically no other outcome.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  10:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I'm amazed this article survived. An AfD saved my life.  Lugnuts  (talk) 10:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In Rainbows, it's not. Sceptre (talk) 13:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:CRYSTAL, WP:HAMMER Niteshift36 (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete per WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. sixty nine   • spill it •  06:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL Rlendog (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Karma Police, delete this article, its WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER violations are making me feel ill.  Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 20:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Stop, Hammer time. JuJube (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Iowateen (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; no title, no track list, no release date. It's WP:HAMMERTIME for this WP:CRYSTALBALL.  Cliff smith  talk  17:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. Eventually there will be more information so the article should be kept until there is, so someone doesn't have to recreate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iminrainbows (talk •contribs) 23:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.