Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radmila Lolly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Radmila Lolly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sourced to press releases and unreliable sources. My own searches turn up passing ,mentions, but no significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Whpq (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Does not pass WP:GNG. Article is essentially just a lot of non-notable information peppered with name-dropping. Likely just WP:TOOSOON. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.