Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radomir Nikov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Radomir Nikov

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Played one game of professional football over a decade ago to scrape a technical presumption of being able to pass WP:GNG but searches of "Радомир Ников" yield very little evidence of notability. A Bulgarian search came back with Via Sport and Darik News as the most promising sources. Both of those, however, are articles in which Nikov is mentioned only once in passing and the depth is sorely lacking as far as GNG is concerned. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 17:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Longstanding consensus regarding WP:NFOOTY is that players that squeak by with 1 or 2 appearances despite thoroughly failing WP:GNG are not notable. Curbon7 (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Bulgarian/Cyrillic sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 14:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.