Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radomir Spetik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 14:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Radomir Spetik

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Czech "inventor" with two patents. Corresponding article was deleted from Czech Wikipedia for lack of notability. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 11:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  18:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete remarkable lack of sources mentioning him for someone claiming to have made breakthroughs in cancer research. -Hunting dog (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even Czech wikipedia deleted his article. - Darwinek (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a vanity article; weak and unsupported notability assertion; no independent sources; deleted from Czech wikipedia. Interesting comment on article's talk page may add weight to the vanity idea, though can't be confirmed unless you read Czech.   Ka renjc 19:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The article from tabloid news, which is linked on the talk page talks about Špetík, who sold false drugs to people ill of cancer, giving them a false hope. There are dozens of such stories in every second country. It only proves the non-notability of this person. -- Darwinek (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

— Brooch (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Not-to-be-Deletedstating that the article was deleted on Czech Wikipedia shows no importance, since it was deleted before it was finished thanks to the constant violation made by its editors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooch (talk • contribs) 21:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * comment to Darwinek: that is where the misleading information starts-Mr. Spetik has never been found guilty of selling false drugs. There are dozens of such gossips everywhere. To keep Wikipedia well running you should beware of similar conclusions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooch (talk • contribs) 23:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, if there are multiple verifiable sources regarding Spetik's alleged conviction, then that would pass WP:N. But then the article would mostly be discussing the conviction.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you Aervanath, i was thinking about the same, will try to fix the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooch (talk • contribs) 16:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even Czech wikipedia deleted his article. Jedudedek (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.