Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radon (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 09:06Z 

Radon (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)



Although the page claims the band is notable, it has no references or sources, or anything to indicate that the band meets any of the notability criteria in WP:MUSIC (aside from being signed to a known indie label, which, if I understand the criteria correctly, is not enough on its own to establish notability without any other sources.) I am also nominating the following related pages:

...and the associated images found on the above pages. RJASE1 Talk  16:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - no evidence of coverage in independent third-party sources to establish notability per WP:BAND. Delete unless sources can be added; even if the band turns out to be notable, there's no need for the separate articles on each of their albums. Walton monarchist89 19:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless links to non trivial and independent articles about this band are added before the end of this debate. Also concur that individual members and releases do not warrant individual articles even if this page is kept. A1octopus 16:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.