Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radu Sărdescu (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 20:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Radu Sărdescu
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. The article's only source confimrms that he has never played in Liga I. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  —Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  —Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - same vote as last AfD because there is still no evidence he has played in the Romanian first division and it's not clear the article would pass the general notability guideline. Jogurney (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:ATH and WP:GNG. How on earth was this kept in the last AfD?!? J Mo 101 (talk) 19:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - don't think he's played in a fully-pro League, so fails WP:ATHLETE; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 21:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: his team profile confirms he has only played in the second division which isn't listed as a fully professional league, so he doesn't meet the notability guideline for footballers and there's no evidence he meets general notability guidelines.  Bettia  (talk)  09:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence to suggest that he has played in a fully professional league. Argyle 4 Life  talk  11:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.