Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Sorkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. J I P | Talk 16:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Rafael Sorkin
This professor, though surely an exceptional academic, does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan.aggregate (talk • contribs)
 * Weak Keep 795 Ghits for the subject, most of which seem relevant.  If some firm evidence of meeting WP:PROF were provided in the article, my "keep" would be stronger.  --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 22:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no evidence of importance. If more was given and wiki'ed, I would say keep, but as is, delete. -- MECU ≈ talk 23:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as per Bugwit. Crabapplecove 03:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has several well-cited papers according to Google Scholar.. up+l+and 06:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep He is the leader of the causal set program, a possible route to quantizing gravity. Babar
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.