Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raffaello (confection)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. User:Samuel Wiki has done justice to the article and has provided and added some sources showing that the article passes WP:GNG. I'm hereby closing as keep since consensus is clear and we don't need another week to debate on this. (non-admin closure)  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 11:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Raffaello (confection)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The product has no third party coverage listed and not much coverage can be found online about the product. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, is this allowed? nominating a yummy chocolate for deletion during the festive season? Coolabahapple (talk) 14:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep It looks like there is enough to meet WP:GNG. A Romanian source has the recipe ("Rețeta secretă a cremei din bomboanele Raffaello a fost dezvăluită. Cum se prepară, de fapt, acest deliciu fin", ), several sources report on a court case ordering Raffaello packing to state the number, not just the weight, of the chocolates when sold in Germany, , , ; a Spanish source describes how Raffaello can be sold all year round, whereas other Ferrero chocolates are seasonal (apparently! though I can't say I've noticed that ;-) ) , and is good for Mother's Day ; in Ukraine, a Russian company was marketing a lookalike chocolate, and Ferrero lost a legal case that it infringed the Raffaello trademark . These sources, and the information about Raffaello from them, could be included in the article. I'm not sure that the date it was first sold is correct - a Daily Mail article (which I know we can't use, but there may well be other sources) says that it had a 28th anniversary party in 2018 . RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets Notability guidelines. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.