Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raflet Stamp Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Raflet Stamp Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable organisation. WP:BEFORE shows no coverage beyond primary sources or WP:ROUTINE Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable organisation. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Andrew I’m afraid to say that these sort of !votes are not terribly helpful. At the moment there are no reliable sources in the article, which breaks a fundamental policy of Wikipedia. If you believe that the organisation is notable, please provide sources that demonstrate notability. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, I did a BEFORE search, and I found the clubs Facebook profile, website, and profiles for stamps they attempted to sell on multiple websites where such things are done. They appear to have passing mentions in the references section of a few books, and that's it as far as secondary sources go. Therefore, this organisation fails GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Probably delete: as not much found about them, though this is one, of a couple of sources, noting their silver jubilee in 1983, so they have been around for quite some time. A few other minor mentions but the article only uses self-references. ww2censor (talk) 13:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Unclear why generic shared-interest association is notable. Reywas92Talk 05:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.