Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rage (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. The rationale for nomination is insufficient and possibly disruptive. No prejudice to renomination on legitimate policy/guideline-based grounds that do not contravene WP:POINT. -- Kinu t /c  08:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Rage (Transformers)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

cruft. Tedescoboy22 (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural close -- wholly insufficient deletion rationale. This kind of language immediately poisons the well for any hope of meaningful discussion of topic. --EEMIV (talk) 02:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural close, insufficient deletion rationale. A more detailed explanation than "cruft" is required. I'm starting to suppose the nominator acts in bad faith. J I P  &#124; Talk 06:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural close - As said above, additionally the nominator seems to have taken the habit of nominating the articles I edit last the last few days and nominating them. Seems to be a vendetta, not an actual attempt to improve wikipedia. Mathewignash (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - The same editor made a similar nomination for Lugnut (Transformers), which should also likely be closed. Mathewignash (talk) 08:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.