Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rage of Mages II: Necromancer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Sources found, withdrawing nomination (non-admin closure) signed,Rosguill talk 16:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Rage of Mages II: Necromancer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Online I was able to find walkthroughs and database entries, but no coverage in reliable sources. The Russian counterpart to this article is extremely detailed but unsourced and mostly about in-game content. signed,Rosguill talk 07:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 07:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 07:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - The MobyGames page lists multiple reviews in what appears to be reliable sources (Particularly PC Games and PC Player). Some of these are still online (1 2 ). The ones we don't have access to still exist and so support notability. Passes WP:GNG as it has WP:SIGCOV in multiple WP:RS. FOARP (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep A failure of WP:BEFORE. Found indepth reviews on Computer Games Magazine, GameSpy GameSpot , IGN , Gamezilla (reliable per WP:VG/RS) , Gry Online (reliable per WP:VG/RS) , Absolute Games (reliable per WP:VG/RS) , coverage in a gaming magazine Svet Kompjutera  a preview on GameZone ... I would suggest the nominator to withdraw the AfD. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per FOARP and Jovanmilic97. Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 11:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Pinging to check the sources. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , yep those look good, withdrawing nomination. signed,Rosguill talk 16:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.