Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragget


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Tito xd (?!?) 04:50, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Ragget
Fails WP:MUSIC. Google search of "Ragget Patrick Oliver Ryan Kevin" brings up 35 hits, none of which have to do with this subject. -Nameneko 00:50, 27 October 2005 (UTC) i think that this article should not be deleted
 * Delete This article is a possible candidate for speedy deletion under WP:CSD as there is little or no meaningful content. It fails to show any evidence that they meet WP:music. Given that they don't have an Allmusic.com page and that a search for Ragget band comes up with little of relevance, they fail to meet WP:V. Capitalistroadster 01:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails to establish notability according to the generally accepted standards of WP:MUSIC. --Stormie 01:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. per Capital. &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 03:15, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. utcursch | talk 05:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly NN. PJM 12:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete content-free and NN - Just zis Guy, you know? 14:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt has beem made to establish notability. TheMadBaron 16:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Completely ridiculous. not notable. vanity.  Newyorktimescrossword 04:23, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment article is an orphan.Geni 13:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.