Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghav Juyal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 10:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Raghav Juyal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Single event (slow motion dancing) notable contestant of a dancing competition. Fails WP:ARTIST. || || {T/C} 14:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Raghav Juyal/Crockroaxz is an internet sensation and a youth icon in India, not just a dancing show contestant known for only one event. His qualifications include winning other reality shows as well. In addition to that, his dancing style is innovative (not just slowmotion but a fusion of various styles) and never attempted before in the world and warrants its own page. There is a lot of interest in him currently with the traffic quite high for his internet searches. This page gives an unbiased introduction to him and I would strongly vote against the prospect of its deletion. Dumbledore1 (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You would need to provide reliable sources for all those claims of "innovative style", "never attempted before in the world", "youth icon", "internet sensation", etc. || || {T/C} 06:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Legitimate publications' articles have been referenced on the page regarding those claims including Times Of India. And being an "Internet sensation" wouldn't need published reliable sources, I would assume. Raghav Juyal generates exceptionally high traffic and hits on major sites like youtube and google. He qualifies WP:ARTIST. Dumbledore1 (talk) 09:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Raghav Juyal has also won another significant reality show so the Single event clause does not apply here. Which, in turn, invalidates the failed WP:ARTIST claim. I would request the nominator to kindly withdraw the nomination since the initial points raised have been refuted, unless it can be proven otherwise. Dumbledore1 (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The several news articles cited in the article, including in the Times of India, Garhwal Post and Hindustan Times are enough to show notability. FurrySings (talk) 04:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not all the sources are reliable, but together with  the mentions in  important  Indian newspapers notability  is asserted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.