Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragheb el-Sergany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America1000 21:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Ragheb el-Sergany

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

don't have any important work in surgeon and he is not have any academic certificate in islam Reza Amper (talk) 11:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable as a philosopher, academic or surgeon.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources inadequate. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as there are several things: one is that WorldCat found an apparent result but the name is not matching and the holdings not being convincing anyway, the other being that the article is rather promotional and the last is being there is nothing else particularly convincing. Notifying for subject analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trivial publication record as a physician, as shown by worldcat-- highest cited article had 3 citations. . Theimportance of the othr activities is impossible to verify.  DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.