Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnarok (Norwegian band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Ragnarok (Norwegian band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No reliable secondary sources about the band to establish notability. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  — Explodicle  (T/C) 17:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — Explodicle  (T/C) 17:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:MUSIC#5 "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels" - 2 albums on Regain Records, per this source.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That source isn't reliable. -- Explodicle (T/C) 13:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 04:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * weak keep. If Regain Records isn't "one of the more important indie labels", please AfD the Regain Records article first. --dab (𒁳) 08:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. In addition to their releases, I found an Allmusic bio and review, Blabbermouth article, and MusicMight - sufficient coverage to establish notability.--Michig (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Michig - I've intergrated a couple into the article.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Those look good enough to keep. Thanks! -- Explodicle (T/C) 18:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.