Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rags (2014 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Rags (2014 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM Cult of Green (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinnambrose (talk • contribs) 03:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Quinnambrose it would help if you explained how the subject meets WP:NFILM. Cult of Green (talk) 04:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I wish the director well, but so far this film has not received any sort of substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the film crew itself. I can't even really see where principal filming has commenced, although that's somewhat irrelevant as we'd still require coverage even if the film was completed in its entirety as existing isn't automatic notability. When the film releases and we have enough coverage to show notability, then the article can be re-created. Right now it's just far WP:TOOSOON. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The article fails #4 and #5 of WP:PROMO. There also are WP:COI problems. Should the film ever become notable a new article can be created. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 15:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Director:
 * Director:


 * Delete (or userfy) per being TOO SOON and lacking coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Allow back after its November release and only if it gets the requisite coverage.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Severely lacking in coverage. AlanS (talk) 11:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.