Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahavard Quarterly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. yandman 12:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Rahavard Quarterly

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable. Created by IP address. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  10:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Looks like a copy-and-paste of this. Google seems to come up with few relevant hits. However, I don't think there are enough mentions of this for it to qualify as sufficiently notable.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  14:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. absoluteastronomy.com is a Wikipedia mirror, i.e. that is a copy of the Wikipedia article rather than the Wikipedia article being a copy of the absoluteastronomy article. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

*Delete, hardly readable, non notable. Deletion Mutation 17:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Blocked sockpuppet. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 20:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage. It does look like a cut&paste from somewhere but not the absoluteastronomy site. JamesBurns (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 18:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.