Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahmatollah Ghadimi Chermahini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Rahmatollah Ghadimi Chermahini

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't see what makes him notable. Tehonk (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Spaceflight, Iran, Sweden, United States of America,  and Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a very convincing nomination, but unable to find much on the subject. The Persian sources (and two others I found) don't appear to be very reliable or are just passing mentions. No strong evidence of notability. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

*Keep - notable for his ongoing multi-national career and for his work on the Shuttle mishap investigation. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. The article has nothing about the Shuttle mishap, so I do not understand that rationale. (If there is something then please edit the article.) Ldm1954 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * For the record, I'm not convinced by the keep vote as well. I would like to see some sources meeting WP:SIRS. Tehonk (talk) 03:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The Shuttle assertion is in the article infobox. I too would like to see the article better sourced. Chermahini was certainly affiliated with the Aeronautical Research Inst. of Sweden and Old Dominion University. Agree: the claims he was a NASA engineer and that his expertise on fatigue crack propagation led to involvement in the Shuttle mishap investigation are not reliably sourced. Consider me neutral. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 04:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - sources provided do not meet the notability guideline for this article. HarukaAmaranth  春香 05:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.