Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Sinha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Rahul Sinha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The person was not elected as a parliamentarian or a legislator. Even, 23 sources make it WP:REFBOMB. Some about its candidacy, some are self published etc. It fails WP:GNG, WP:NPOL or other criteria. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NPOL since the subject has never won any national or state level elections. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  05:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:NPOL, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:SOAP. Party officials are not automatically notable, but there is some coverage about this national, major party official. I am concerned that we avoid becoming a soap-box. Bearian (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , BJP has 12 Vice presidents, 8 National Joint Secretaries, 3 Jt. Gen. Secretary, 13 National Secretary. And in that pecking order. Although the name sounds like a big Kahuna, this is a lower post in the ranking. May I request you to review your opinion.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. The sources present here are

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * 1) First 10 are about president of BJP's state unit. (1, 3, 10 self published; 2, 4, 5 about sworning as BJP state unit president; 6, 7, 8, 9 interview and others). These made the article WP:REFBOMB.
 * 2) The sources present here in political career are typical election type coverage of subcontinental newspaper.
 * 3) The first source of controversy are not encyclopedic according to me. A person's relatives can support any party why he/she will face criticism for this? And the last sources about his controversies about his comment which are not enough for our notability guideline. I hope you will change your stand!S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above discussion. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.