Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Varun (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This article also could be deleted via CSD G5 as it became a battleground between different sockfarms. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Rahul Varun
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-Notable actor and journalist, failed in wikipedia general notability guideline Also, I noticed that this article has been accused of being a 'paid article' before, and the same argument was made in the last nomination as well. So I think now the editors should be allowed to decide. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Journalism, News media,  and Bihar. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: the deletion discussion about this page is already discussed and closed Articles for deletion/Rahul Varun Wikisfrog (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It was closed because the nominator was blocked, not on the merits of the page.— Moriwen (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Sources 8 and 14 are the only ones listed as reliable per Source Highlighter. 8 seems rather promo, telling people how to succeed. 14 is fine, but the rest doesn't add up to notability, only confirming what they've done as a career. Oaktree b (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not satisfy WP:NACTOR and the sources are weak. Perfectstrangerz (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.