Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rail-rocking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Rail-rocking
Non-notable and non-verifiable TMac 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC) for BJAODN. Barno 01:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete TMac 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Nice try at an article; though it was interesting. BJAODN. Royal Blue   T / C  00:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * From the article: "Although generally shunned and considered idiotic and dangerous, it has begun to accumulate" ... delete votes. Not much
 * Delete Yet another Test article. In fact, I think the term Test article should be acknowledged just the same as test edit. Its pretty much the same principle. -- Jay  (Reply)  01:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, sorry, WP:NFT. Bad ideas 02:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jay Ruby 02:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, the Jay man. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. Blnguyen 04:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NFT.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NFT. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't sound like a sport or a joke. Almost a troll, it seems.  (aeropagitica)   07:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like a troll. S iva1979 Talk to me  11:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Not notable + unreferenced + poorly written + contradictary + original research + made up one day at school = Strong Delete Bobby1011 14:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nonsense, dangerous, unencyclopædic, WP:NFT, vancarlimospacecraft, absolute idiocy, moronic, immature, infantile, and just plain stupid Avi 17:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 01:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Dogbreathcanada 20:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not verifiable, likely test article FloNight 15:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.