Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rail transport in Inner Mongolia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Rail transport in Inner Mongolia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No useful context. only "Rail transport in Inner Mongolia is administered by the People's Republic of China." GZWDer (talk) 10:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep (but will someone please expand). So there are trains in Inner Mongolia. Then the topic is clearly notable and we will, in the fullness of time be wanting an article on it. I see no benefit in deleting anything here, even this sub-stub, just to have to come back and reverse the decision later. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into Rail transport in China. Note that no other wiki-language versions have a stand-alone article. Lamberhurst (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rail transport in China. Having an article just for the sake of having an article is pointless without meaningful content; it has potential for a standalone article. --Cold Season (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons given by Andy Dingley. Biscuittin (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * There is actually quite a lot on rail transport in Inner Mongolia. Please look at the categories. Biscuittin (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. 71.237.195.240 03:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.195.240 (talk)


 * Merge to Rail transport in China, Who actually thought this article was worth creating? .... ,
 * - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  03:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Neither redirection nor merging with Rail transport in China would actually achieve anything. It is the lack of information that is the problem at present, and as pointed out by Biscuittin it is only by following the category link that it is possible to discover what rail provision exists. That is not too difficult to remedy. The statement about how the railways are administered is a valid and important piece of information that should be included in the article, and it is a reasonable search term. We do not delete articles simply because they are stubs, and I am with Andy Dingley here. --AJHingston (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It is not a one line stub. There is a list of rail lines in Inner Mongolia each of which links to articles that are more than simple stubs. For example, did you know that the world's last mainline steam train service was on the Jining–Tongliao Railway in Inner Mongolia. As Andy Dingley said above, this may be a stub today but it isn't going to be a stub tomorrow. There is an notable article waiting to be created here. In the mean time it serves as a useful list and portal. Rincewind42 (talk) 06:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rail transport in China. Lamberhurst (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Andy Dingley. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 16:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.