Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railfan window


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete and redirect.--Fuhghettaboutit 10:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Railfan window

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The writer introduces a term for a storm door on a railcar which is not accepted by enough people to make it acceptable for encyclopedic use. On an enthusiast site web page, one can use whatever terminology invented or not, one likes. On my own website, I can call a trumpet a clarinet or invent any term I like - it doesn't mean it belongs in an encyclopedia. Perhaps a reference to the term sould be made in Wiki pages discussing storm doors or railcars.19:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Raryel
 * Delete as eminently unnotable neologism. Whether this term has any currency or not, the topic -- subway cab design -- is simply not notable. If we had an article on subway cars themselves (as opposed to individual types of subway cars, which we do) this is information that belongs in that article, which could cover topics such as stanchions, hanging straps, seating, doors, HVAC, and so forth. --Dhartung | Talk 21:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hold on: See if the article can be properly cited. But I do wonder if it meets WP:N. --AEMoreira042281 22:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. hangon is designed for speedy deletion, but articles for deletion generally offers an article five days for discussion or improvement. That's enough for somebody to scare up a couple of reasonable sources for something like this -- if they exist.--Dhartung | Talk 09:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I quote Wikipedia policy:

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Shortcut: WP:NOT#OR WP:NOT#OTHOUGHT WP:NOT#PUBLISHER WP:NOT#FORUM Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information not heretofore published. Please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following:

Primary (original) research such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining new words, etc. If you have done primary research on a topic, publish your results in other venues such as peer-reviewed journals, other printed forms, or respected online sites, and Wikipedia will report about your work once it becomes part of accepted knowledge. Not all information added to Wikipedia has to be from peer-reviewed journals, but please strive to make sure that information is reliable and verifiable. For example, citing book, print, or reliable web resources demonstrates that the material is verifiable and is not merely the editor's opinion. Original inventions. If you invent the word frindle or a new type of dance move, it is not article material until a secondary source reports on it. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day! Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the consensus of experts). Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge. It is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of human knowledge. In the unusual situation where the opinions of a single individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome in your user namespace or on the Meta-wiki. There is a Wikipedia fork at Wikinfo that encourages personal opinions in articles. -- Based on that, I propose deletion. 22:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Raryel
 * Delete as nonnotable neologism lacking sources showing its use. Edison 04:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of U.S. railfan_jargon. There is an entry for this term there. -- JLaTondre 13:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --BOARshevik 01:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * delete then redirect per JLaTondre. DewiMorgan 17:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.