Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpower RP20BD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn request. Favonian (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Railpower RP20BD

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has no sources and no reliable sources could be found in news or Google search, prod has been removed by ip  Rmzadeh  ►  19:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Per ANI threadAni I also challenged prod on merit.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, is now referenced. 64.53.177.123 (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, sourceable. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing WP:V. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I was looking to snowball the process but sourcing still has issues, 2 references mentioned, 1st only regarding fuel consumption, 2nd is regarding a different locomotive altogether. the 1 sentence claim made in the article is not verifiable. Proper sources need to be added.  Rmzadeh  ►  20:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Are we talking about issues to be covered in an AFD or that would normally be discussed on the talk page of the article? If the only issue is having enough citations, I would think that is a matter of tagging the article or using FACT tags, and raising the issue on the talk page. Not like it is a BLP.  The original nomination was about passing WP:V(a valid concern), which seems to be taken care of even if all the claims aren't sourced.  Dennis Brown (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Request withdrawn Sources have been added. Article still lacks substance and facts but it no longer fits deletion policy. Snowball please. Thank you  Rmzadeh  ►  20:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.