Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railway prices and costs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Railway prices and costs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Previously speedied at G11, now totally lacking in any sources. delete UtherSRG (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources can be added. J I P  | Talk 05:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense.   talk 05:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably meets speedy criteria, but it would be best to create precedent at AfD in case another clone of this appears to minimize busywork. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no context, no notability, not an encyclopaedic subject. Claritas (talk) 08:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and rescue Poorly written, but valid topic for encyclopedia. Dew Kane (talk) 14:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't this be better in the railway article? If you ever find enough information to fill its own article, it could be split off again.  Or is this meant to be a list of every railway out there, what they charge(prices) and what they cost to build(costs)?   D r e a m Focus  00:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Insufficient context to allow other editors to meaningfully expand the article. Also unencyclopedic content, and arguably just gibberish. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: wikipedia is not a directory of prices... maybe someone could write a decent article or section about railroad economics... Arskwad (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete but there may be some content to merge ... somewhere ... (no idea where). Peterkingiron (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable topic in its own right. It could be worth a mention in another article, but I won't suggest a merge as none of the current content is valuable in any way at all. Alzarian16 (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.