Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RainCatcher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

RainCatcher

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sadly, I cannot seem to find any significant coverage of this organisation in reliable, independent secondary sources. I might be wrong and I hope I am. However, Google rarely lies and a Google search returned nothing. Therefore, it is with a heavy heart that I nominate this page for deletion for not meeting wp:ORG. GDX420 (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Confusion added by a project at Imperial College London called Raincatcher Imperial. As per nom, I could find nothing out there, and that sucks, but WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.