Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RainCode PL/1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to PL/I. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

RainCode_PL/1
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:GNG requirement for coverage in reliable sources. Also does not appear to meet WP:NSOFT coverage requirements. I suggest either deletion or merge into the PL/1 article. Batard0 (talk) 06:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know if it is relevant enough to keep this page, but it is an existing compiler, and the only one doing this job (PL/1 on microsoft .net platform)... If you think that it is not useful for Wikipedia, feel free to remove it... (I created a reference into the PL/1 page). The compiler is currently used by some huge banks in the Nordics (via Scandinavian Data Center) and is supported by Microsoft Corp. I though it was a good idea to let Wikipedia know it (maybe it wasn't ;) ) The merge within PL/1 is a good idea. \\

Fontignie (talk) 07:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:08, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not deserve a separate article -- Anbu121 ( talk me )
 * Redirect to PL/1 - Considering there isn't a current article for the company, RainCode, redirecting the article to PL/1 would be best. Google News archives results provided two press releases that mention the programming language itself but not RainCode's product exactly, although the second result mentions "compiler design for PL/1". There appears to be insufficient information and sources for an appropriate article at this time but I appreciate the author's good intentions and efforts. SwisterTwister   talk  22:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.