Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Lodge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Rainbow Lodge



 * – (View AfD) (View log)

fishing lodge, and no longer exists Fremte (talk) 01:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - A fishing lodge, as with any place, can be notable. In this fishing lodge's case it has received significant coverage from multiple independent sources.  (these are only a few of what I found with a 2 second g-search).  According to The Guardian, it had become "the most popular camping lodge west of the Rockies."  That it no longer exists is not grounds for deletion (I dare the nom to put the Hanging Gardens of Babylon up for AfD).--Oakshade (talk) 04:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Don't dare the nom to put the Hanging Gardens of Babylon up for AFD...Stranger things have happened! In any event you won me over. - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * the first major building in the Alta Lake (whistler) area is not significant? someone needs to re-read their history —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.240.212 (talk) 07:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC) -Preceding comment copied from article talk page by Thryduulf (talk) 08:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Oakshade. Doc Quintana (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment it would be great if the sources were added into the article so someone doesn't mistakenly renominate this two years later down the road. (Yes, that does happen.)  JBsupreme (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade et al, sources are present and need to be added. Oh well, as usual it's always someone else's problem. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per above discussion. Add the sources, please. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per dennis the 2 et al. Bearian (talk) 00:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, and I added two of the references to the article, slackers.--Milowent (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.