Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield ladder bug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield ladder bug
A single bug in a computer game is not notable enough for an article by itself (only in rare cases of very notable software/hardware bugs, like the Y2K bug and Pentium FDIV bug), and the creator of the article has already added information on the same bug to the article Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield itself anyway. Prod removed without comment or improvement. ~Matticus TC 14:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - short, redundant dicdef. No excuse for this article. Unless the phrase ladder bug has some other common meaning, I'd consider re-directing it to Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield. My Alt Account 14:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom--Whpq 17:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 18:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 05:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * delete without redirect, since content has already been merged and article title is very unlikely to be a link target or search term. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 13:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. A single, rare, bug does not need an article. +Fin- 16:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable bug. Probably OR. guitarhero777777 04:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * delete There are a few video game glitches notable enough to be owrthy of an article. Minus world is one of them, perhaps the only one.  No way does this qualify. Ace of Sevens 07:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- NORTH talk 05:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.