Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Vacuum

Rainbow Vacuum
Wikipedia is not an advertisement for Rainbow Vacuums. DS 21:34, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with Vacuum cleaner. Khanartist 21:38, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)


 * Delete - merge would be OK also, but its not really worth our time to help people turn their deliberate advertising into content. Let them work for it by correctly working it into the article themselves.  Johntex 22:51, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. If the contributor wishes to add NPOV material to the vacuum cleaner article that's fine, but I'd watch their POV rather carefully. Claims as to the merits of this particular cleaner (one of several currently using similar technology and sales methods) are particularly suspect. Andrewa 23:37, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, ad. Wyss 23:40, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. What Johntex said. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:22, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I've tried to NPOV it but my vote is still delete. This one brand of vacuum cleaner is not notable enough to merit an entire article. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:29, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Spam. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 12:35, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Idiocy
Delete? This is a special type of vacuum that uses a unique system of water filtration, costing up to $2000, the vacuum also functions as a steam cleaner, air filtration system and has other, unique functions. I don't understand why at least one of you idiots didn't fact check or do any research before issuing an uninformed knee jerk reaction. Unlettered imbeciles like you are what give Wikipedia a bad name and also why it has to beg for money. Nobody likes you. You have no friends. There is a good reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:63:C3E6:4400:5DA:B887:C43E:B47B (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)