Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbowatarian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Rainbowatarian

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD; reason was "Unsourced neologism". This term lacks reliable third-party sources to establish notability, and an earlier version of the article states the term was invented in February 2010 at a University. Rodhull andemu  15:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability, and as a Neologism. If the term gains notariety over time, perhaps an article would be appropriate. But if it's just been made up, not so much. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:NEO, WP:NFT. The Google results say it all. — Rankiri (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: the article for this relatively-new word was created too soon. Alexius08 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unnotable neologism. Dlabtot (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given PanchoS (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.