Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raine Larrazabal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Raine Larrazabal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Says she's only been a contestant, not a winner in contests, and seems to be mainly noted as being a sister of another model. The-Pope (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- The-Pope (talk) 14:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- The-Pope (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, sadly. I could not find enough reliable sources to prove notability on her own right, if her sister doesn't have an article here, what more her? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above failure to find references fails WP:N and WP:V JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: don't you hate it when you try to look at a source and your virus scan tells you its a bad place to be! Couldn't find sources in Phillipine Daily Inquirer, either.--Milowent • talkblp-r  17:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant reliable, secondary coverage, I did find where she'd been named FHM's #58 sexiest woman for 2008 (from a site that's blocked by WP's spam filter), but it's just a name on a list, there's still no significant coverage of this model. (Resisting the urge to make any of a number of jokes here.) -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  22:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, unable to find sufficient non-trivial coverage in reliable sources to sufficiently establish notability. — J04n(talk page) 14:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.