Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainwater Hog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  →TSU tp* 10:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Rainwater Hog

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced article by COI author, non notable, tagged as such for 3 years, is long enough. Dicklyon (talk) 20:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Leaning Keep – The topic appears to meet WP:GNG:, , , , . Mentions: , . Northamerica1000(talk) 11:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Mother Nature Network gives it ample coverage. Get mentioned enough elsewhere as well.   D r e a m Focus  18:00, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly notable, as there are many efforts to use rainwater rather than have it go into sanitary sewers, including here in Philadelphia. Also it is useful information. Unfortunately, being useful information is not a reason to keep an article, according to Wikipedia standards, but I mention it anyway. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.