Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raison d'être (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Raison d'être (band)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:BAND. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google News search turned up evidence of coverage in various languages other than English, and it looks like there may be enough there for notability purposes. There is also this review at Allmusic. Other coverage from a Google search: Interview in a German web magazine, News article in Side-Line, News article in Re:Gen +, coverage at essence-music, some of which may be ok as sources.--Michig (talk) 06:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article also lists numerous CDs which could mean they meet the criterion for multiple albums on a notable label. Together with the potential sources by Michig, it appears the nominator didn't do the required homework before nominating. - Mgm|(talk) 10:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Source mentions seem to be enough. Page however needs a good scrub to get rid of weasel and gush. Plutonium27 (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.