Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Raja (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Killerserv Talk 08:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep So WHY is this article not-notable?! Keep per WP:ENT - starred in many notable films.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, there is no explanation as to why this article should be deleted. From what I can see, it appears legit. --Soman (talk) 09:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. But needs references. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  09:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:ENT. Has no references (yet), but they can be found relatively easily. Perhaps some WP:BEFORE work should have been done, Spizzilizounge,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  11:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello can you please cite some of the easily found sources? I'm inclined to agree with the deletion right now based on the article content alone, given that the nom's rationale is ... non-existent I am abstaining for the moment.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 20:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (No explanation). Dr. Blofeld       White cat 14:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:ENT. Joe Chill (talk) 16:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- – Spaceman  Spiff  17:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- – Spaceman  Spiff  17:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment no comment.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep Notability in India per significant career and significant awards is notability enough for Wikipedia. Searches must by neccessity (the commonality of a one-sylable theatrical name) use his name AND the films or awards.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a no-brainer.  No reason for nomination.  Clearly notable under WP:ENT.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.