Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Rai Rattan Pal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Raja Rai Rattan Pal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:GNG. He may have been a minor chieftain - there were thousands of them in pre-independence India - but there are virtually no sources that discuss him. This one is self-published by someone who has no obvious expertise (BSc degree) and it seems likely that the information there in comes from p. 500 of this, which in turn is based on British Raj gazetteers that are routinely rejected as being reliable sources for history. Sitush (talk) 14:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not shown to be notable. We don't even know when this gentleman lived.  The same user has created other one sentence pages.  See my post on WT:INDIA.  All pages should be quickly AfD'd.   Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  21:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence meets our criteria for notability. Dougweller (talk) 13:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has no reference at all neither the subject is itself notable.--Skr15081997 (talk) 16:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.