Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Selvakumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Raja Selvakumar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC. Definitely too soon. – Ploni (talk) 21:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Science. Ploni (talk) 21:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too soon is right. Still a graduate student, so WP:NPROF is pretty hopeless. I don't see a GNG pass either. -- asilvering (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of lasting notability from his high school science contest days, or of anything more recent that would add to his notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think being interviewed at the White House counts for notability. A Ted Talk isn't as notable as it used to be, I find no sources either that help notability. Oaktree b (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON at best. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:SNOWBALL at this point, but definitely a TOOSOON case for an academic. If they do ever reach a level of notability, the article could be easily rewritten then. KoA (talk) 21:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.