Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajan Raheja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Rajan Raheja

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Blatant advertisement. Do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. fails WP:GNG GermanKity (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Insufficient sources, and doesn't pass WP:GNG. Very hard to find anything that would count. The page is basically a résumé. -- Tautomers (T C) 06:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Merely being rich doesn't necessarily equates to notable. Fails wp:GNG RationalPuff (talk) 08:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes basic notability Germartin1 (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium  10:34, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Coverage fails criteria for significance and independence in the GNG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG. None of the citations discuss him in any depth (he has only a bare mention) - except the Forbes article, which does not establish notability by itself. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  15:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete FAILS WP:GNG, doesn't meet notability Nitesh003 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.