Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajan Zed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. – Steel 14:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Rajan Zed

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Article appears to be written by the subject WP:COI. For someone so 'notable' there appears to be very few independent websites attesting to his importance. It has been claimed that he is listed in Who's Who in America. This is a publication of the American Biographical Institute that does negligible research into the notability of individuals. Fails WP:Notability and WP:BIO Maustrauser 22:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Northern Nevada International Center and Nevada World Trade Council, which have him on their Board of Directors, are fairly well-known organizations. He was elected unopposed to the office of General Improvement District Trustee of Verdi TV District in Nevada in the November 2006 US mid-term elections. His activities/efforts in the inter-faith dialogue in northern Nevada, diversity initiatives in Washoe County School District, leadership in various ethnic organizations, volunteership and public service in social/cultural/other organizations, etc., show that he must be included in the popular enclyclopedia like Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.14.205.200 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO by end of this AfD Alf photoman 01:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete if sourced, the accomplishments would be N. and worth a keep.DGG 11:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Rajan Zed's achievements/activities portray him as a strong candidate for inclusion in Wikipedia.
 * Actually, they don't, since Wikipedia has higher standards than Who's Who. --Calton | Talk 13:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless extraordinarily good reliable sources turn up. --Calton | Talk 13:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.