Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Kumar Jain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Rajesh Kumar Jain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete, person not notable. One of the two references quoted (bollywoodtrade.com), does not even mention his name and the other one just has one line mention. IMDb is not a reliable source.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  11:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Update Please have a look on updates and feel to ask if you have any confusion, you mark the page in middle when we were writing, Please look all the stuff again.


 * Update I didn't heard from anyone so far and provide useful link and source from internet, from top websites like IMDB, Business Standard, Financial Express, Times of India, Mid Day, India Infoline, There are few other will be updated soon. meanwhile removing deleting banner as its not required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AllHeartWeb (talk • contribs) 17:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. utterly promotional article on relatively minor  film producer.  DGG ( talk ) 22:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I waited for others to comment or else I would've commented especially since we're close to a week again, these subjects often of course get only expected coverage specially with this media but there's still nothing confidently suggesting the solidity of solid independent notability. Apparent updates are still not convincing. Delete therefore at best.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.