Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajhesh vaidhya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Rajhesh vaidhya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability questionable. No independent sources. Eeekster (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I added some references, including one from The Hindu which establishes that he won the 2010 Kalaimamani award for his veena playing. I think that gives notability.  I cleaned up the article and added a refimprove tag.  A related article that should probably have an afd discussion is Vegam, a movie Vaidhya directed the music for.  It has no references and (probably) is not notable, as the mentions I saw of it were minor and negative...but I digress.  Oh, one more thing, the title of the article, should it stay, should be changed so that his last name is capitalized (I didn't do it, in case I'm wrong).   Nihola (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep – Multiple articles about him in The Hindu, including this one, so meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.