Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raji Sohal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The "keep" arguments are weak. Being a national radio and television personality is not grounds for inclusion per WP:BLP and WP:BIO, only having substantial coverage in reliable sources is. Such coverage appears to be lacking here, at least as far as can be determined from the article and a Google search.  Sandstein  05:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Raji Sohal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unremarkable freelance writer/stylist. Fails WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The primary claim of notability here is the fact that she's a regional and national radio and television personality, not freelance writing or fashion styling. Keep. Bearcat (talk) 03:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as a national radio and television personality in Canada. Article could certainly stand expansion and better referencing. - Dravecky (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete though I agree with Dravecky's facts. The referenced portion of this article is one sentence long. Notability is borderline and IMO BLPs should default to delete. (I don't remember whether they do default to delete, but this is an article where that comes into play.) Chutznik (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.