Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiasar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Rajiasar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Even though locations are normally inherently notable, this article is poorly written, uncategorized, contains no inline citations or references for WP:V. Also contains no inbound links from other articles.  Flewis (talk) 06:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- I disagree with your assertion that locations are inherently notable. But you're right about there being no sources, and I can't find anything suitable on Google. Reyk  YO!  07:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable village. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep By definition, as acknowledged by the nominator, real communities are inherently notable. Can we find sources to verify that it exists?  If not, this could be deleted as a hoax; but the problems mentioned by the nominator are only problems that need cleanup, not deletion.  Nyttend (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's an inhabited community, the sort of thing that encyclopedias exist to write about, and an encyclopedia that is not paper can cover even the smallest communities. Poor writing and lack of categorisation and inbound links are reasons for editing, not deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Real places are inherently notable and Phil has show it is a real place. Edward321 (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Claim of schools is verifiable. Not all villages have schools in India.  Docku: “what up?”  23:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.