Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Chilaka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — Theo polisme  01:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Rajiv Chilaka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is not updated and has multiple issues It does not have even one External Links or Reference Greatuser (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article makes several verifiable claims of notability about its subject.  Google turns up plenty of coverage in mainstream news sources.  Lack of updates is not a valid criterion for deletion.  —Psychonaut (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect To one of those wiki references? I'd say redirect to the animation company's article but it appears there is none, which I find odd. I don't see how the CEO merits a standalone article if all he's known for is being CEO of that one company. § FreeRangeFrog 21:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Newspaper articles in The Hindu and The Telegraph include some biographical coverage of Chilaka. It's also very easy to find reliable sources where he's mentioned or interviewed in print articles and television segments covering his company and creative work (e.g., ); of course, notability isn't inherited but taken together even these alone probably contain enough details about the man himself to meet WP:BASIC. That he meets WP:FILMMAKER seems a no-brainer given the coverage and critical acclaim of his creative output. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Psychonaut. Secret of success  ·  talk  14:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - He meets point 3 of WP:CREATIVEwith Chhota Bheem series. In addiiton to the articles above, there is also this one in The Hindu. -- Whpq (talk) 17:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.