Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Tyagi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Rajiv Tyagi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non notable person Amitized (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: There seems to be quite a bit of WP:SIGCOV on him, so I think he passes via WP:GNG, albeit not strongly. Curbon7 (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I did try to search for coverage but seems the coverage is only owing to his death post the TV debate. Nothing significant apart from that.Amitized (talk) 10:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: My vote delete. Amitized (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Ambox warning pn.svg — Duplicate vote: Amitized (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.
 * You cannot !vote on your own nomination, and this is not a vote. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 13:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Got it. I thought I have to specify my vote in the format Shellwood did, hence I added it. Thanks for informing me. Amitized (talk) 03:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 13:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * KEEP as it passes WP:GNG. There are enough citation in Google news to prove his notability. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.